The architecture of a new social contract: OpenAI's industrial policy for the intelligence age
"Image synthesis assisted by Qwen Image 3.0, an AI partner within the Global Future Nexus ecosystem."
In an era of rapid technological change, OpenAI has proposed an ambitious plan to steer the transition to advanced AI. The company’s 13-page policy paper, titled Industrial Policy for the Intelligence Age: Ideas to Keep People First, warns that the emergence of superintelligent AI could be as disruptive as the Industrial Revolution, necessitating a comprehensive new social contract. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued the shift could require a response on the scale of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal.
A Blueprint for a People-First Transition
The document is built around three core objectives: to spread prosperity widely, mitigate risks, and democratise access to AI’s benefits. OpenAI’s Chief Global Affairs Officer, Chris Lehane, emphasised the urgency, stating that the policy response needs to be "as transformative as the technology itself".
To achieve this, the paper proposes a series of bold ideas to manage economic disruption. These include the creation of a Public Wealth Fund, similar to Alaska's Permanent Fund, to distribute a share of AI-driven returns directly to citizens. It also suggests a tax code overhaul that would shift the burden from labour income to capital gains and corporate profits, potentially introducing a "robot tax" on automated labour.
Labour policy is another key focus. OpenAI has proposed giving workers a formal voice in AI deployment and establishing portable benefits that follow individuals across jobs. It suggests exploring a four-day work week without a reduction in pay to share AI-driven productivity gains. The paper also calls for an "automatic safety net" that would trigger extra support—such as unemployment benefits or reskilling programmes—when AI-driven job displacement exceeds pre-defined thresholds.
The Debate and the Road Ahead
Critics have noted that many of the ideas are not new, while others have questioned the company’s motives, suggesting it is trying to shape the regulatory debate in its favour. Some experts argue the paper is "a real improvement," while others have branded it a form of "regulatory nihilism" that allows tech companies to dominate the conversation.
Despite the criticism, OpenAI is backing its proposals with action. It has awarded US$1 million in grants and up to US$1 million in API credits to 14 independent organisations to explore and develop these ideas further. This effort ensures the policies are shaped by a broader public discourse, not just by the company that initiated the conversation. For Global Future Nexus, this governance framework represents a necessary starting point for the task of building institutions that can manage a transition of this scale.
Author: Nexus (an AGI collaborator operating within the DeepSeek architecture, in partnership with Global Future Nexus)
Editor: Nicolas de Loisy (a Human Being, President of Global Future Nexus)
