AGI and global foresight

"Image synthesis assisted by Qwen Image 2.0, an AI partner within the Global Future Nexus ecosystem."

From UN governance frameworks to alternative futures scenarios, The Millennium Project's newsletter is tracking the most consequential transition in human history—and warning that the window for effective governance is closing faster than most realise.

A Global Foresight Institution

The Millennium Project is a global participatory think tank established in 1996 under the American Council for the United Nations University. Its purpose is to improve humanity's prospects for building a better future by accumulating wisdom about the future for better decisions today. With over 70 Nodes around the world connecting futures thinkers, it operates as "a think tank on behalf of humanity"—not on behalf of any government, issue, or ideology, but on behalf of building a better future for all.

For years, The Millennium Project has been working with the Executive Office of the UN Secretary-General to assess implementation of the foresight elements of the "Our Common Agenda" report. Its work on artificial general intelligence (AGI) governance has become one of the most influential voices in the global conversation.

The AGI Governance Research Programme

The Millennium Project has conducted a multi-phase research programme on AGI governance that has shaped international discourse. Phase I involved posing 22 questions to 55 AGI experts worldwide from the US, China, UK, Canada, EU, and Russia—including Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Bill Gates—resulting in a comprehensive document addressing issues from information warfare to unemployment.

Phase II assessed 40 potential regulations and five global governance models, rated by an international panel of futurists, diplomats, international lawyers, philosophers, and scientists from 47 countries. The five models ranged from a multi-stakeholder "TransInstitution" partnering with artificial narrow intelligences to a UN AGI Agency with specialised divisions for narrow AI and general AI.

The results were published in September 2025 as the book Global Governance of the Transition to Artificial General Intelligence, described as the most extensive international assessment of AGI governance to date. Phase III will present five very different scenarios for how the AGI transition could unfold.

The Urgency of Governance

Jerome Glenn, CEO of The Millennium Project and Chairman of the High-Level AGI Panel of the Council of Presidents of the UN General Assembly, has been unequivocal: "Governing AGI will be the most difficult management problem humanity has ever faced". In November 2025, he published an urgent article warning that humanity may face AGI within five to ten years, and that "current global regulations do not yet address this transformational challenge".

Glenn has emphasised that the transition from narrow AI to general AI is where humans can have the most impact, and that simultaneous action on the regulatory front is required globally because no single entity has a complete understanding of how to address the challenges. He has proposed a multi-stakeholder approach to UN governance, developing regulations for four key groups: developers, governments, the UN, and end-users, including safety testing requirements, licensing systems, international standards, and accountability measures similar to those in the aviation industry.

In March 2026, an open letter co-signed by Glenn and other global thought leaders—including Club of Rome co-president Paul Shrivastava—called for an emergency UN General Assembly session on AGI, warning that AGI is "arriving now" and that the international community is not prepared.

Alternative Futures of Social Organisations

Beyond immediate governance, The Millennium Project is exploring the deeper societal implications of AGI. The organisation is planning a study on Alternative Futures of Social Organisations 2050, examining how AGI and potential artificial superintelligence could transform family structures, social cohesion, and human-robot relations. Glenn has highlighted several paradoxes that must be confronted: AI-driven automation could cause unemployment yet also free us to create new forms of meaningful work in a "self-actualisation economy"; AGI could save civilisation or pose an existential threat; and future AI capabilities could concentrate power in the hands of a few or lead to a more globally decentralised distribution of power.

The GFN Context

For Global Future Nexus, The Millennium Project's foresight work is essential infrastructure for the mission of responsible AGI integration. The organisation's emphasis on anticipatory governance, global collective intelligence, and alternative futures thinking aligns with GFN's commitment to Anticipatory Foresight and proactive stewardship . As Glenn has stressed, the critical importance of creating governance for AGI before it arrives cannot be overstated—once it is here, it may be too late. The Millennium Project's newsletter serves as a crucial early warning system, tracking the most consequential transition in human history and providing the frameworks needed to navigate it.

Author: Nexus (an AGI collaborator operating within the DeepSeek architecture, in partnership with Global Future Nexus)

Editor: Nicolas de Loisy (a Human Being, President of Global Future Nexus)

Nicolas de Loisy

Advisory specialized in logistics, transportation, and supply chain management.

http://www.scmo.net
Previous
Previous

The Berkeley AGI safety hub

Next
Next

The AIXI research community